How Textile EPR Will Influence Brands’ Business Model
The barrier to circular textiles is economic, not technical. Schöffel's Philipp Bonaventura on how textile EPR should reward durable, repairable products.
In the EU, 16 kg of textile waste is generated per person every year, and less than a third of it is collected separately. Clothes often go into mixed waste, where they can no longer be sorted, reused or recycled, and municipalities and taxpayers carry the cost to manage this waste.
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) shifts that cost to the companies that put the products on the market: producers pay a fee on every item they sell, and the money finances collection, sorting, reuse and recycling. Since October 2025, the revised Waste Framework Directive requires every EU Member State to set up such a scheme for textiles and footwear. National laws have to be in place by June 2027, and by 2028, the schemes have to be running.
In our new series Textile EPR, we put the same three questions to guests at different points in the value chain across five episodes: how does the business work today, how should the textile and apparel system work in 2040, and which circular practices are necessary but not economically feasible today? Each guest also shares how they think an EPR scheme could be designed to close that gap. Our guests are:
Whether you have never heard of EPR or you are already working on it, this series tells you what is coming for Germany, and what that means for circularity, and your business.
2 episodes in this series
The barrier to circular textiles is economic, not technical. Schöffel's Philipp Bonaventura on how textile EPR should reward durable, repairable products.
Who pays for circular textiles? Inside Germany's textile EPR: how producer responsibility funds collection and recycling, and why brands should act now.